<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Options &#187; COAL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energy-options.info/category/coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energy-options.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CLEAN COAL POWER TO THE PEOPLE IN KOREA</title>
		<link>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/clean-coal-power-to-the-people-in-korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/clean-coal-power-to-the-people-in-korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CARBON TRADING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIMATE CHANGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELECTRICITY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THERMAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power clean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KOREA POWER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new coal fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world power to korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy-options.info/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KOREA DOES IT CLEAN IN COAL FIRED POWER PLANT Boilers &#8211; a power plant’s heart Fluidised -bed boiler installation. www.doosanheavy.com Internet link Korea South East Power runs an eco-friendly power plant armed with state-of-the-art, high- efficiency environmental facilities &#8211; including a DeSOx &#38; DeNOx System, and electrical dust collectors- but a new fluidised bed boiler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>KOREA DOES IT CLEAN IN COAL FIRED POWER PLANT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Boilers &#8211; a power plant’s heart Fluidised -bed boiler installation.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-199" title="jellinbah-east-coal-mine_t" src="http://energy-options.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jellinbah-east-coal-mine_t.jpg" alt="jellinbah-east-coal-mine_t" width="150" height="100" /></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>www.doosanheavy.com Internet link</strong></p>
<p><strong>Korea South East Power runs an eco-friendly power plant armed with state-of-the-art, high- efficiency environmental facilities &#8211; including a DeSOx &amp; DeNOx System, and electrical dust collectors- but a new fluidised bed boiler is key to the operation.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Korea&#8217;s latest and largest coal-fired, eco-friendly,high-efficiency powerfacility &#8211; officially titled the Yonghung Thermal Power Plant Units 3and 4 &#8211; has been operating at optimal levels recently. This is all thanks to thenew core facilities and boiler equipment.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Run by Korea South East Power, the units are now part of an 870MW-class coal-fired power plantwhich uses ultra super criticaltechnology. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Moreover, the facility is aneco-friendly power plant armed with<br />
state-of-the-art, high- efficiency environmentalfacilities (including desulfurisation, DeSOx &amp; DeNOx System, and electrical dust collectors).<br />
A company spokesman told IPA: “The completion of the Yonghung Thermal Power Plant Units 1 and 2 has contributed<br />
to easing the imbalance between power supply and demand in the Seoul metropolitan region, and has helped<br />
stabilise the nation&#8217;s electricity supplynetwork. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Generators 3 and 4 at the plantmake a significant contribution tostabilising the power supply during the peak power demand season in summer.” Power output<br />
The Yonghung Thermal Power Plant Units 3 and 4 generate 13.6 billion kWh of electricity per year, enough to supply 4 million households.</strong></p>
<p><strong> In 2004 Doosan an initial contract for the supply of boilers for the site in an international bid hosted by KoreaSouth-East Power in 2004, beating out Japanese rivals.<br />
Hard on the heels of this successful project, Doosna was recently contracted to supply equipment worth 100 billion won (£50m) for a project involving the supplyof Korea&#8217;s largest 340MW- class Fluidised- Bed Boiler for Yeosu Thermal Power Plant No. 2 operated by Korea South EastPower.<br />
Doosan President &amp; CEO Geewon Park commented: &#8220;The contract involved the supply of a 340 MW-class Circulating<br />
Fluidised-Bed Boiler and supplementary facilities.</strong></p>
<p><strong> Unlike a Pulverized Coal Boiler, which is used in most conventional power plants, the Circulating Fluidised-Bed<br />
Boiler is an eco-friendly boiler product which significantly reduces the emission of pollutants such as nitrogen oxide and<br />
sulphur oxide. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Another advantage is that it can use low-grade coal as fuel, effectively cutting fuel costs.” Cutting fuel costs with a Circulating Fluidised-Bed Boiler at Yeosu replacing the use of heavy oil, the plant will not only cut down fuel cost significantly, but also reduce pollutant emissions. Hence the utility facilities, once revamped, will transform into an<br />
economical, eco-friendly power plant.<br />
Under the contract, Doosan plans to design and produce the Circulating Fluidised- Bed Boiler and supplementary equipment at its Changwon Plant, and deliver them by December 2011. Doosan has also signed a licensing agreement with Foster Wheeler, a global market leader in Circulating Fluidised-Bed Boiler technology, in 2006.<br />
Executive Vice President Dongsoo Suh said, &#8220;With the acquisition of the new project, Doosan has set a precedent in<br />
the supply of a 340 MW-class Circulating Fluidised-Bed boiler, the largest scale of its kind in Korea and among the largest in<br />
the world.&#8221;<br />
He added: &#8220;As the use of low-grade coal is steadily increasing, Doosan will continue to win more orders for Circulating Fluidised- Bed Boilers not only in Korea but also in overseas markets in the future.&#8221; Doosan also won projects for<br />
the construction of coal-powered thermal power plants adopting Circulating Fluidised-Bed Boilers in Thailand and the<br />
Philippines in 2007.<br />
On June 14th, 2009, Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction signed a contract worth 74 million euros (US$102<br />
million) with MAPNA Boiler of Iran for the overall supply of eight heat recovery steam generators (HRSGs) for four combined cycle thermal power plants in the Middle Eastern country. &#8220;The project entails the supply of two HRSGs to each of the four combined cycle thermal power plants located in Kahnooj, Iran. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Doosan plans to begin designing the equipment<br />
based on its own technology in June, and is scheduled to supply them in phasesfrom April to December of 2010,&#8221; a<br />
spokesman told IPA.<br />
Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction secured the top spot in terms of global market share in 2003 thanks to the acquisition of HRSG orders worth 240 million euros(US$ 331 million) for the MFPNA combined cycle thermal<br />
power plant, the world&#8217;s largest singlesuch project. </strong></p>
<p><strong>The company also won successive orders in the Middle East in<br />
2007 and 2008. Dong Kyu Lee, head of the HRSG BU at<br />
Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction, told IPA: &#8220;Doosan was able to win the project thanks to the strong engineering<br />
capacity we have demonstrated during the execution of our other projects in Iran.” IPA</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sourced and published by Henry Sapiecha 16th July 2009</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-23" title="flashing-bright-blue-line" src="http://energy-options.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flashing-bright-blue-line-300x5.gif" alt="flashing-bright-blue-line" width="460" height="5" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/clean-coal-power-to-the-people-in-korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RECOVER CARBON DIOXIDE FROM FLUE GASES</title>
		<link>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/recover-co2-from-flue-gases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/recover-co2-from-flue-gases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BY-PRODUCTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARBON TRADING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIMATE CHANGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVIRONMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUIPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEATING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MANUFACTURING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BURN OFFS NON TOXIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARBON CREDITS FOR EMISSIONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLEAN GASES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMISSIONS TREATED SAFELY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTORY CHIMNEY STACKS NOW OK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLUE GAS RECYCLED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOSPITAL WASTE TREATED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TREATED SMOKE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy-options.info/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitsubishi Heavy to Test CO2 Recovery from Coal-fired Flue Gas Printer-Friendly digg This! E-Mail Article del.icio.us Absorbing solution &#8220;KS-1.&#8221; It is an amine-based material having an absorbing performance higher than that of monoethanolamine (MEA), which has been used thus far. The KS-1 helps reduce the amount of absorbing solution used in the entire plant. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="breadcrumb"><a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/"></a></div>
<p><!--TITLE--></p>
<h1>Mitsubishi Heavy to Test CO2</h1>
<h1>Recovery from Coal-fired Flue Gas</h1>
<p><!-- end of articleinfo --> <!--PHOTO:right--></p>
<div id="toolandimage">
<div id="tool">
<div id="{DF6BFC04-0D0B-40FC-A7FD-0CAB35E6F446}" class="print"><a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090525/170622/?ST=english_PRINT" target="new">Printer-Friendly</a></div>
<div id="{E386958E-B199-4E5B-BF6A-292ACE085EEF}" class="digg"><a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2%26url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'%26title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+'%26bodytext='+encodeURIComponent(document.absttext.bodytext.value)+'%26topic=tech_news'">digg This!</a></div>
<div id="{97F6FAA4-D1C2-422F-99ED-2D8450A51B49}" class="email"><a id="popup-mail" onclick="popupIM()" href="mailto:">E-Mail Article</a></div>
<div id="{F35B4555-9E9A-4E9E-8CD8-18FA23CC0B9A}" class="del"><a onclick="window.open('http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&amp;noui&amp;jump=close&amp;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&amp;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+'&amp;notes='+encodeURIComponent(document.absttext.bodytext.value), 'delicious','toolbar=no,width=700,height=400'); return false;" href="http://del.icio.us/post" target="new">del.icio.us</a></div>
<form>
<input name="bodytext" type="hidden" value="Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (MHI) and Southern Company, a major US power company, will jointly launch a field test in 2011 to recover high-purity carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-fired flue gas." /></form>
</div>
<p><!-- end of tool --></p>
<div id="main-img">
<p><a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090525/170622/?SS=imgview_e&amp;FD=1521591393&amp;ad_q" target="new"><img src="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090525/170622/thumb_230_3A.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Absorbing solution &#8220;KS-1.&#8221; It is an amine-based material having an absorbing performance higher than that of monoethanolamine (MEA), which has been used thus far. The KS-1 helps reduce the amount of absorbing solution used in the entire plant.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090525/170622/?SS=imgview_e&amp;FD=1522514914&amp;ad_q" target="new"><img src="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090525/170622/thumb_230_3B.jpg" alt="" /><br />
A conceptual image of the demonstration plant with a recovery capacity of 3,000t per day</a></div>
<p><!-- end of main-img --></div>
<p><!--end of toolandimage--> <!-- article --> <!-- free images layout --> <!--article txt-->Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (MHI) and Southern Company, a major US power company, will jointly launch a field test in 2011 to recover high-purity carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from coal-fired flue gas.</p>
<p>The two companies will set up a CO<sub>2</sub> recovery demonstration plant, which is designed to be built at a medium-scale thermal power station in Alabama, the US. Based on the results of this demonstration plant, they will aim to commercialize the recovery plant in the future.</p>
<p>The field test will be subsidized by the US government. The demonstration plant will be constructed in Plant Barry, a coal-fired power station owned by Southern&#8217;s subsidiary Alabama Power. Recovered CO<sub>2</sub> will be compressed and stored in an aquifer deep underground.</p>
<p>The demonstration plant is composed of various facilities such as those for pre-processing, CO<sub>2</sub> absorption/reclamation (absorption and reclamation towers) and CO<sub>2</sub> injection. The plant will recover 500t of CO<sub>2</sub> per day (equivalent to that produced when 25,000kW electricity is generated). The recovery rate is 90% or higher. The purity of recovered CO<sub>2</sub> is expected to be 99.9%.</p>
<p>The recovery process is as follows. Coal-fired flue gas contains not only CO<sub>2</sub> but also &#8216;impurities&#8217; such as SOx, NOx, heavy metals and halogen compounds. These impurities are removed as much as possible in the pre-processing facilities, and the flue gas is cooled to near room temperature.</p>
<p>Flue gas with most impurities removed is taken into the absorption tower. Inside the tower, the gas is brought into contact with an absorbing solution so that only CO<sub>2</sub> is absorbed into the solution. The solvent, &#8220;KS-1,&#8221; is an amine-based material co-developed by MHI and Kansai Electric Power Co Inc.</p>
<p>Next, the solution containing CO<sub>2</sub> is sent to the reclamation tower, where CO<sub>2</sub> and the solution are separated from each other by heating. Then, CO<sub>2</sub> is recovered, and the solution is recycled.</p>
<p>MHI has already commercialized a system to recover CO<sub>2</sub> from natural gas-fired flue gas. But, in order to apply this system to coal-fired flue gas, an additional process is required to remove heavy metals and halogen compounds because the impurities contained in natural gas-fired flue gas are only SOx and NOx.</p>
<p>Electric Power Development Co Ltd is also testing a CO<sub>2</sub> recovery plant for coal-fired flue gas at its Matsushima Thermal Power Plant. However, the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> recovered at the plant is only 10t per day. Therefore, a field test needs to be carried out using a larger scale plant for commercialization.</p>
<p>In addition to the field test announced this time, MHI is planning to construct a demonstration plant with a recovery capacity of 3,000t per day in the UK and intends to start trial operations in 2015.</p>
<p><strong>Sourced and published by Henry Sapiecha 1st July 2009</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-87" title="yellow-black-line" src="http://energy-options.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/yellow-black-line-300x5.gif" alt="yellow-black-line" width="445" height="5" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/07/recover-co2-from-flue-gases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ENERGY SUMMIT TO DISCUSS OIL BURNING AND BIOMASS FUELS</title>
		<link>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/06/energy-summit-to-discuss-oil-burning-and-biomass-fuels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/06/energy-summit-to-discuss-oil-burning-and-biomass-fuels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIO GAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIO MASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHARCOAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENERAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIO FUELS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bio mass fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIMATE CHANGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN FUEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green gasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin rudd and emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL BURNING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAVE POWER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy-options.info/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heating the Northeast with Renewable Biomass Roughly 30% of the energy used in the U.S. is for heating and cooling, and a large proportion of the energy used for heat comes from burning oil. While using renewables to generate electricity and solve transportation issues (the other 70% of the equation) receives the lion&#8217;s share of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="white-space: normal;">Heating the Northeast with Renewable Biomass</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-71" title="milanobanner1" src="http://energy-options.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/milanobanner1.jpg" alt="milanobanner1" width="446" height="83" /></p>
<div id="{A4F1534E-8C73-4F45-B320-80F68C773D19}" class="enewscontent">
<p>Roughly 30% of the energy used in the U.S. is for heating and cooling, and a large proportion of the energy used for heat comes from burning oil. While using renewables to generate electricity and solve transportation issues (the other 70% of the equation) receives the lion&#8217;s share of attention from policymakers, the organizers of the first &#8220;Heating the Northeast with Renewable Biomass&#8221; conference that took place in Nashua, NH, are hoping to change that.</p>
<p>Opening the conference was a keynote by New Hampshire Governor John Lynch, who said that New Hampshire is a good place to focus on renewable biomass for heat.  The region is comprised of 84% growing forest and therefore biomass is in large supply.</p>
<div id="{2FE172F7-68A0-42C0-A471-86C78B8F9E55}" class="photo"><img src="http://www.onlinetes.com/images/email/093_photo5jesmer.jpg" alt="" width="232" height="232" /><br />
Photo Credit:Graham Jesmer</div>
<p>Neibling also unveiled the <a href="http://www.biomassthermal.org/" target="_blank">Biomass Thermal Energy  Council (BTEC)</a>, a new organization that will work in Washington, DC to bring awareness about and favorable policy for biomass thermal energy.</p>
<p>William Straus, President of <a href="http://www.futuremetrics.net/" target="_blank">FutureMetrics</a>, a firm that performs economic modeling and forecasting, explained that just in the state of Maine, 80% of the homes heat with oil.  That adds up to more than $1 billion dollars annually spent on oil with a large proportion of that money going overseas.   If you look at the entire Northeast, which includes New England and New York, the number is $13.7 billion annually &#8211; all money that is traveling out of the region.</p>
<p>Straus showed a model of a hypothetical scenario in which 1% of the homes in the Northeast converted to biomass thermal heating systems each year for 10 years, with local or federal governments offering a $6,000 tax credit (roughly the difference between a new high-end oil furnace and a pellet furnace).  In 10 years time, he explained, the government would be looking at a net benefit to the treasury of approximately $7.1 billion in increased tax revenue and more than one-hundred thousand new jobs.</p>
<p><strong>Sourced and published by Henry Sapiecha 23rd June 2009</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-23" title="flashing-bright-blue-line" src="http://energy-options.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flashing-bright-blue-line-300x5.gif" alt="flashing-bright-blue-line" width="450" height="5" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energy-options.info/2009/06/energy-summit-to-discuss-oil-burning-and-biomass-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

